<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/05/technology-trends.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/05/technology-trends.html</link>
	<description>Web Entrepreneur</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Smullin</title>
		<link>http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/05/technology-trends.html#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smullin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 16:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/05/technology-trends.html#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Very interesting trend comparison. I like it! You know, I am learning Ruby on Rails, too. 

Ruby has been around a lot longer than Ruby on Rails. You'll see better results using that keyword, but only slightly. I had no idea Java was so popular, though.

Did you know our very own Jamis Buck of 37 Signals here in Utah is a recovering Java developer? He switched to RoR and is a much happier developer from what I can tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting trend comparison. I like it! You know, I am learning Ruby on Rails, too. </p>
<p>Ruby has been around a lot longer than Ruby on Rails. You&#8217;ll see better results using that keyword, but only slightly. I had no idea Java was so popular, though.</p>
<p>Did you know our very own Jamis Buck of 37 Signals here in Utah is a recovering Java developer? He switched to RoR and is a much happier developer from what I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
