<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CakePHP &#8211; a good transition into Ruby-on-Rails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html</link>
	<description>Web Entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:39:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why I Prefer Ruby on Rails over CakePHP at Jimmy&#8217;z Blog</title>
		<link>http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html/comment-page-1#comment-8135</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I Prefer Ruby on Rails over CakePHP at Jimmy&#8217;z Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 19:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html#comment-8135</guid>
		<description>[...] framework. By learning CakePHP, I was able to wrap my mind around the rails framework concepts and make that transition a little easier. This year, I have made the full plunge into the Ruby on Rails, and I absolutely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] framework. By learning CakePHP, I was able to wrap my mind around the rails framework concepts and make that transition a little easier. This year, I have made the full plunge into the Ruby on Rails, and I absolutely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy&#8217;z Blog &#187; Picking up Ruby on Rails after CakePHP</title>
		<link>http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html/comment-page-1#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy&#8217;z Blog &#187; Picking up Ruby on Rails after CakePHP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 01:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>[...] So, I&#8217;m finally diving into Ruby on Rails. The transition to Ruby on Rails from using CakePHP is going fairly smoothly. Now that I am really comfortable with the MVC framework that CakePHP uses, the learning curve has been pretty minimal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, I&#8217;m finally diving into Ruby on Rails. The transition to Ruby on Rails from using CakePHP is going fairly smoothly. Now that I am really comfortable with the MVC framework that CakePHP uses, the learning curve has been pretty minimal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy&#8217;z Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;m in the International PHP Magazine!</title>
		<link>http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html/comment-page-1#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy&#8217;z Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;m in the International PHP Magazine!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html#comment-363</guid>
		<description>[...] I checked my Google Analytics today, and I noticed that I got quite a bit of traffic from the International PHP Magazine (http://php-mag.net). Apparently, they wrote on my previous post about CakePHP being a good transition into Ruby on Rails. To be honest, I had visited the magazine site before, but I just spent a few minutes checking out their articles, and they have some really good stuff for php Jedi Masters. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I checked my Google Analytics today, and I noticed that I got quite a bit of traffic from the International PHP Magazine (<a href="http://php-mag.net)" rel="nofollow">http://php-mag.net)</a>. Apparently, they wrote on my previous post about CakePHP being a good transition into Ruby on Rails. To be honest, I had visited the magazine site before, but I just spent a few minutes checking out their articles, and they have some really good stuff for php Jedi Masters. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html/comment-page-1#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html#comment-344</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in the same boat in regards to being reluctant to develop another site without a proper framework! The problem is I&#039;m having a difficult time choosing which one! The thing that appeals to me about Ruby is that it has Rails and only Rails. Plus I&#039;m intrigued by the syntax!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the same boat in regards to being reluctant to develop another site without a proper framework! The problem is I&#8217;m having a difficult time choosing which one! The thing that appeals to me about Ruby is that it has Rails and only Rails. Plus I&#8217;m intrigued by the syntax!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Snow</title>
		<link>http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html/comment-page-1#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html#comment-339</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re going to love Rails, Jimmy. Awesome platform, and we&#039;re about 2 months out from launching our first big Rails site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re going to love Rails, Jimmy. Awesome platform, and we&#8217;re about 2 months out from launching our first big Rails site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RKM</title>
		<link>http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html/comment-page-1#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>RKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmyzimmerman.com/blog/2006/08/cakephp-a-good-transition-into-ruby-on-rails.html#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Jimmy, did you try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phpontrax.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PHP on Trax&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.symfony-project.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Symfony&lt;/a&gt;?  Trax was developed by a local PHP developer named John Peterson and was intended to be a verbatim &quot;port&quot; of Rails.  Symfony appears to have a large community.  I haven&#039;t tried them, so if you have I&#039;d be curious to get your opinion.  John Taber also wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johntaber.com/?p=10&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;about several frameworks&lt;/a&gt; but didn&#039;t really like any of them, so I&#039;m sure your opinion in favor would be interesting to hear in detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy, did you try <a href="http://www.phpontrax.com/" rel="nofollow">PHP on Trax</a> or <a href="http://www.symfony-project.com/" rel="nofollow">Symfony</a>?  Trax was developed by a local PHP developer named John Peterson and was intended to be a verbatim &#8220;port&#8221; of Rails.  Symfony appears to have a large community.  I haven&#8217;t tried them, so if you have I&#8217;d be curious to get your opinion.  John Taber also wrote <a href="http://www.johntaber.com/?p=10" rel="nofollow">about several frameworks</a> but didn&#8217;t really like any of them, so I&#8217;m sure your opinion in favor would be interesting to hear in detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
